A fact becomes evidence when it has a job
Students often insert dates and names because they seem impressive. Evidence matters only when it contributes to the reasoning. Before using a fact, know what claim it supports and what it allows you to explain.
One precise example that is fully analysed can be more valuable than three examples that are simply listed.
Use the claim–evidence–significance sequence
Start with a claim that answers the question. Introduce the most useful evidence. Then explain significance: what does this evidence show, why does it matter and how strongly does it support the claim?
This final step is where many answers lose marks. The writer assumes the examiner will make the connection. Make it explicit.
- Claim: the analytical point.
- Evidence: a precise supporting example.
- Significance: why the example matters.
- Qualification: any important limit or comparison.
- Link: what this means for the question.
Description vs analysis
Description
- States what happened
- Lists facts or follows chronology
- May leave the relevance implicit
Analysis
- Explains why evidence matters
- Links evidence to the exact question
- Builds judgement throughout
Choose evidence for comparison
If the question asks for importance or relative responsibility, evidence should help compare factors. A useful example may reveal scale, duration, timing or dependency.
Ask whether the evidence proves that one factor mattered independently or whether it only became effective because of another factor. That creates evaluation rather than simple support.
Build evidence banks by theme
Revision is easier when evidence is organised around analytical themes. For a causation topic, create a small bank for political, economic and social factors; for change, organise evidence around turning points.
Add one sentence explaining why each example matters. This makes the notes usable for essays rather than merely memorable.
Frequently asked questions
How many pieces of evidence should be in a History paragraph?
There is no fixed number. Use enough precise evidence to substantiate the claim, then analyse it properly rather than listing examples.
Are dates essential in every paragraph?
Dates can add precision, but relevance matters more. A named policy, statistic, person or event may be the stronger evidence depending on the claim.
What should I write after a piece of evidence?
Explain what it shows, how it connects to the question and how strongly it supports your argument.